Texas Personal Injury Expert Witnesses: Strengthen Your Case

Dashcams are everywhere now—from commuters on I-35W to rideshare drivers on West 7th in Fort Worth, Texas. When a crash happens, those few seconds of video can be the difference between a strong claim and a tough fight. Below is a practical, Texas-specific guide to using dashcam footage the right way: is it legal to record, how courts admit it, how to preserve it so it actually holds up, and how we present it to insurers and juries.

Is it legal to use a dashcam in Texas?

Recording is generally legal. Texas is a “one-party consent” state for recording conversations. If you are a party to the conversation (or one party consents), audio recording is lawful. Texas Penal Code §16.02 and related guidance confirm one-party consent, and Texas also provides a civil cause of action against illegal interceptions in Chapter 123 of the Civil Practice & Remedies Code. 

Mind the windshield. Texas restricts objects or materials on the windshield that obstruct the driver’s view. If your dashcam (or its mount, cord, or stickers) materially obstructs your view, that can be a traffic offense—and in a lawsuit, the defense may argue the placement contributed to the crash. See Transportation Code §547.613 (Restrictions on Windows).

Privacy pitfalls. Audio of passengers is usually fine if you’re in the conversation, but secretly recording other people’s private conversations can trigger criminal and civil liability. (There’s a private civil cause of action for unlawful interception, with statutory damages, under CPRC §123.002.) 

When is dashcam footage admissible in a Texas court?

Texas courts admit dashcam video under the ordinary Rules of Evidence—no special “tech rules” required. We focus on four pillars: relevance, authentication, best-evidence, and hearsay.

1. Relevance (Rules 401–403). The clip must make a disputed fact more or less probable (e.g., who had the green light) and its probative value can’t be substantially outweighed by risk of unfair prejudice or confusion.
2. Authentication (Rule 901). You must show the video “is what you claim it is.” You can do this with:
   • Witness testimony (you installed the dashcam; the location/time look right).
   • Distinctive characteristics/metadata (device model, GPS/time stamps, file path).
   • Evidence about a process or system showing the camera reliably records (Rule 901(b)(9)). Texas courts accept the “silent-witness” theory for video—no eyewitness to the events is required if the system’s reliability is proved.

3. Helpful Texas cases:
   • Fowler v. State—Court of Criminal Appeals discussed authenticating store surveillance video under Rule 901;
   • Tienda v. State—Texas’s leading case on authenticating digital evidence based on circumstantial markers; the same logic applies in civil cases.

4. Best-evidence rules (Rules 1001–1004). Courts treat “photographs” to include video in any form. For electronically stored information, an “original” includes any accurate printout or visual output; duplicates are generally admissible unless authenticity is reasonably questioned.
5. Hearsay (Rules 801–803). The video itself isn’t hearsay. But spoken words captured on the audio track can be. Common paths around hearsay:
   • Opposing party’s statements (801(e)(2))—admissible when offered against them.
   • Business records (803(6))—often useful for commercial fleet cams with automated logging and custodian affidavits (Rule 902(10)). 

Preservation: how to keep your dashcam clip admissible (and avoid spoliation)

Once a crash happens—and certainly once a claim is reasonably anticipated—you have a duty to preserve relevant evidence. Texas’s spoliation doctrine (from Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Aldridge) allows courts to impose sanctions or adverse inferences if evidence is lost or altered. 

Our recommended preservation protocol (do these immediately):

1. Secure the source media. Remove the SD/microSD card and write-protect it (use a lockable adapter). Don’t keep recording over it. Make two verified, read-only copies.
2. Hash the files. Create SHA-256 hashes for the original and each copy; record them in a simple chain-of-custody log (who handled what, when, and where). Courts respond well to this discipline even in civil cases.
3. Keep it native. Preserve the native file(s) with the original metadata (timestamp, GPS, device info). Screenshots or re-exports may be fine for negotiation, but they’re secondary for court. The Rules of Evidence prefer the original or a faithful duplicate.
4. Don’t edit. No cropping, filtering, speed-ups, or “compilations” in your working copy. If we later prepare a demonstrative clip, we’ll also offer the unedited original to avoid Rule 403 issues.
5. Send preservation letters. If another driver, a trucking company, or a rideshare platform may have video (exterior cameras, dashcams, storefront cams), we send preservation letters right away to stop routine deletion. Brookshire teaches that the duty to preserve arises when litigation is reasonably anticipated. 

Producing and obtaining dashcam video in discovery

Texas discovery has special rules for electronic data:

• Rule 196.4 (TRCP) governs ESI. The requesting party should specify the form (e.g., native .MP4 with metadata). The responding party must produce what’s reasonably available or object if the request is unduly burdensome; courts apply proportionality.
• For business-record dashcams (e.g., fleet systems), we often use a custodian affidavit under TRE 803(6) & 902(10), served at least 14 days before trial.

How we present dashcam evidence so it persuades

1. Foundation first. We authenticate with either (a) a witness familiar with the device and scene, or (b) the “process/system” route under Rule 901(b)(9) with device specifications, settings, and integrity steps (hashes, chain-of-custody).
2. Context matters. We prepare a timeline synced to key frames (light phases, speeds, distances) and, when helpful, pair it with intersection diagrams or event-data-recorder (EDR) readouts.
3. Avoiding 403 traps. We show the full, unedited clip and supply a short demonstrative if needed. Providing full context reduces “misleading” objections.
4. Audio strategy. If the audio includes the other driver’s admissions (“I never saw you”), those are typically non-hearsay as opposing-party statements (801(e)(2)). Statements from bystanders may require a hearsay exception—or we rely on the video and call the witness.
5. Comparative fault defense. Be ready: if your camera placement arguably obstructed your view, the defense may argue negligence. Proper mounting (see §547.613) and clear testimony about line-of-sight help neutralize this.

Practical FAQs

Q: My dashcam overwrites footage every few hours. What now?

Pull the power, remove the card, and preserve immediately. If it is overwritten, ask us about subpoenas/preservation letters to nearby businesses, city traffic cams, or the other driver’s telematics/dashcam. Texas spoliation law rewards early, reasonable preservation efforts. 

Q: Do I have to give the insurer my video right away?

We usually control the release until we’ve reviewed the liability and damages strategy. If we share early, we provide a faithful and accurate copy and preserve the original per the best-evidence rules. 

Q: The clip has my passenger talking. Is that a problem?

Not usually. Texas is one-party consent; if you were a participant, the recording is lawful. If someone else’s private conversation was captured (and you were not a party), talk to us before sharing. 

Q: Can the court reject my video because it’s a copy?

Not if it’s an accurate duplicate and authenticity isn’t in reasonable dispute (Rule 1003). If authenticity is challenged, we offer the original or explain why it’s unavailable under Rule 1004. 

Bottom line

Dashcam footage can make your Texas car accident case—but only if it’s lawfully recorded, properly preserved, and cleanly authenticated. Our team at the HLAW law firm builds the evidentiary foundation from day one so insurers and juries see what really happened—clearly and credibly.

If you have dashcam video from a crash (or think someone else does), contact our office right away. We’ll lock down the evidence, send preservation letters, and put it to work for your case.

Key Texas Authorities (for readers who want to dig deeper)

• Recording & privacy: Texas Penal Code §16.02 (one-party consent); CPRC §123.002 (civil cause of action for unlawful interception).
• Windshield/placement: Transportation Code §547.613 (Restrictions on Windows).
• Admissibility & authentication: Texas Rules of Evidence 401, 403, 901, and Article X (Rules 1001–1004).
• Spoliation: Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Aldridge, 438 S.W.3d 9 (Tex. 2014).
• Digital authentication in Texas: Fowler v. State, 544 S.W.3d 844 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); Tienda v. State, 358 S.W.3d 633 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
• Discovery of electronic video files: Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 196.4 (ESI form/production; proportionality).  

Have You Been in a Car or Truck Accident in Texas?

Dashcam footage can be a game-changer—but only if it’s preserved and presented correctly. If you’ve been injured in a car or truck accident, don’t wait. Insurance companies and defense attorneys will act fast to minimize your claim.

📞 Contact HLAW today for a free consultation. Our experienced personal injury attorneys will review your case, secure critical evidence like dashcam video, and fight to get you the compensation you deserve.

Your first call costs nothing—and it could make all the difference in your recovery.

How Medical, Engineering, and Accident Reconstruction Experts Can Strengthen Your Case

When you’ve been injured in an accident—whether in a car crash, trucking accident, a workplace incident, or on someone else’s property—your claim often comes down to one question: Can you prove it? In Texas personal injury cases, proving fault and the extent of your damages isn’t just about telling your story—it’s about presenting credible, persuasive evidence. That’s where expert witnesses play a critical role.

Under Texas law, an “expert” is someone who has “scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge” that will help the judge or jury understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue (see Texas Rules of Evidence, Rule 702). These experts provide opinions grounded in their professional training and experience—opinions that can make or break your case.

1. Why Expert Witnesses Matter in Texas Personal Injury Cases

Expert witnesses are different from regular witnesses. Regular witnesses can only testify about what they personally saw, heard, or experienced. Experts, on the other hand, can:

• Analyze the cause of an accident.
• Explain complicated medical conditions.
• Interpret engineering failures or design defects.
• Reconstruct accidents to show how and why they occurred.

The Texas Supreme Court has emphasized that expert testimony must be reliable and relevant—meaning it must be based on sound methodology and actually help the factfinder (see E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Robinson, 923 S.W.2d 549 (Tex. 1995)).

2. Types of Expert Witnesses That Can Strengthen Your Case

 

A. Medical Experts

In most personal injury claims, medical testimony is key to proving the nature and extent of your injuries. Medical experts can:

• Explain how an accident caused your injuries.
• Detail your required treatment and recovery time.
• Estimate the costs of ongoing or future care.
• Connect your injuries to the event, countering insurance company claims that they were “pre-existing.”

In Texas, medical causation often requires expert testimony—especially for complex or non-obvious injuries (Guevara v. Ferrer, 247 S.W.3d 662 (Tex. 2007)).

B. Engineering Experts

Engineering experts analyze structures, machinery, and environmental conditions that may have contributed to your accident. They are invaluable in:

• Slip-and-fall cases (floor friction, lighting conditions).
• Defective product cases (design flaws, manufacturing defects).
• Construction accidents (scaffolding failure, code violations).

Texas premises liability law (see Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 75.002 and § 101.022) often hinges on whether a property owner knew of and failed to correct a dangerous condition—an engineering expert can help prove this.

C. Accident Reconstruction Experts

Accident reconstructionists use physics, engineering principles, and crash data to recreate the events leading up to an accident. They can:

• Analyze skid marks, debris patterns, and vehicle damage.
• Determine speed, direction, and impact points.
• Create computer simulations or visual exhibits for trial.

These experts are particularly useful in auto and trucking accident cases governed by Texas Transportation Code and federal motor carrier safety regulations.

3. How Expert Testimony Influences Texas Juries and Judges

In Texas, juries decide most personal injury cases. A well-qualified expert can help:

• Break down complicated technical language into clear explanations.
• Provide visual aids, diagrams, and 3D models to make the evidence memorable.
• Establish credibility with unbiased, fact-based opinions.

An expert’s ability to explain “why” something happened—and back it up with evidence—can dramatically strengthen your position at mediation, in settlement negotiations, or at trial.

4. The Legal Requirements for Admissible Expert Testimony

Texas courts apply a strict standard for admitting expert testimony. Rule 702 requires that:

1. The expert is qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.
2. The testimony is based on a reliable foundation.
3. The testimony will assist the trier of fact.

Courts also apply the factors to evaluate reliability, which include:

• Testing of the expert’s theory.
• Peer review and publication.
• Potential rate of error.
• General acceptance in the relevant community.

If your attorney doesn’t choose the right expert or prepare them properly, your evidence could be excluded—leaving you without the proof you need.

5. Why You Should Consult Our Firm for Free If You've Been Injured And Might Need An Expert

At Howard, Lotspeich, Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW), we know which experts can make the difference in your case. We regularly work with respected medical professionals, engineers, and accident reconstructionists across Texas who have the experience and credibility to stand up in court.

Here’s why consulting with us—at no cost to you—is the smartest move:

• We cover the upfront costs of hiring the right experts for your case.
• We know the local courts and judges, so we understand which experts resonate best in front of a Tarrant County and North Texas juries.
• We only get paid if we win—meaning we’re invested in making sure your case is supported by the strongest evidence possible.

Whether you’ve been in a serious car crash, trucking accident, suffered an injury on the job, or been hurt by a defective product, having the right expert testimony can be the deciding factor. Don’t take chances with your case.

Free Consultation:

If you or a loved one has been injured, contact HLAW today for a free, no-obligation case review. We’ll explain whether expert witnesses could help in your situation—and how we can put them to work for you. Call us at 817-993-9249 or fill out our online form to get started.

How Insurance Companies Monitor Claimants and How to Protect Yourself

1. Why Do Insurance Companies Use Surveillance?

Surveillance is a frequent tool employed by insurers in personal injury cases to assess the validity of claims and guard against fraud—even in honest cases. These investigations typically target injuries that are subjective (like chronic pain or soft-tissue injuries) or claims involving large payouts  .

Insurance companies may deploy private investigators to observe claimants’ daily activities—tailing them in public, taking photos or videos, or even requesting field visits, like home visits, particularly in long-term disability or workers’ compensation claims  .

Defense counsel also rely on surveillance to challenge credibility by capturing footage suggesting the claimant is more active than their alleged injuries permit.

2. Common Surveillance Tactics in Texas

• Physical Surveillance: Private investigators may station themselves in public areas, follow claimants, or stake out known routines—all technically legal if conducted from public spaces.
• Video & Photographic Surveillance: Filming or photographing a claimant engaged in activities that contradict their medical claims (e.g., heavy lifting, sports, yard work) can be powerful evidence for insurers.
• Social Media Monitoring: Insurance companies often scour social media for posts, photos, or comments that might be leveraged against a claimant’s injury narrative.
• Interviews with Acquaintances: Insurers may contact friends, family, or neighbors to gather informal statements or observations—sometimes unintentionally undermining your case.
• Field Visits: Investigators may visit your home under the guise of follow-up, taking note of your environment or daily habits—potentially used to raise doubts about your limitations.
• Electronic Tracking: While more common in auto insurance contexts, insurers may obtain driving behavior data—sometimes collected without informed consent—and use it to assess claims or adjust premiums.

3. What Texas Law Allows—and Limits

• Surveillance from public spaces is generally lawful. Private property surveillance, trespassing, or recording in private areas (like inside your home) is typically prohibited.
• Video evidence could be admissible in personal injury litigation, but Texas courts typically require trial judges to review surveillance before excluding it.
• Data privacy protections in Texas are evolving: lawsuits have been filed against Allstate and GM for allegedly collecting and using driver location data without consent—potentially impacting surveillance practices in insurance.

4. How to Protect Yourself: Best Practices

1. Stay Modest in Public - Follow your doctor’s restrictions consistently. Avoid activities—even on good days—that may appear inconsistent with your injuries.
2. Limit & Secure Your Social Media - Set your accounts to private. Avoid posting about your health, recovery, or activities. Be cautious of well-intentioned friends sharing photos involving you.
3. Stick to the Facts - Don’t embellish your story to adjusters or others. Consistency is key—contradictory statements make credibility easier to attack.
4. Know What IS Protected - Investigators cannot legally record inside your home areas where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy, hack your digital accounts, or enter without consent.
5. Consult an Attorney Promptly - If you suspect you’re under surveillance, inform your attorney rather than confront anyone—lawyers can help challenge improper evidence or even turn surveillance to your advantage in negotiations or at trial.
6. Document Your Condition - Maintain clear records of medical appointments, treatments, and limitations. Having contemporaneous documentation can help counter misinterpretations of surveillance footage  .

5. Summary

Surveillance in personal injury cases is common in Texas. Insurance companies may monitor claimants physically, digitally, or through third-party reports to challenge injury claims—even legitimate ones. While much of this activity is legally permissible when carried out in public spaces, there are boundaries—especially regarding privacy violations.

Staying informed, cautious, and consistent—especially regarding your public behavior and online presence—is essential. Our attorneys at Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) can help you navigate surveillance threats and protect your interests throughout the claims process. Contact us today for a free case evaluation and consultation.

Boating is a favorite pastime across Texas — from the shores of Eagle Mountain Lake and Possum Kingdom Lake to the Gulf Coast. But when fun on the water turns into tragedy, victims and their families often face serious injuries, costly medical bills, and tough legal questions about who is responsible.

Under Texas law, boating accident liability can be complex, involving state boating regulations, general negligence principles, and in some cases, criminal statutes for intoxicated operation. Here’s what you need to know if you’ve been involved in a recreational accident on Texas lakes, rivers, or coastal waters.

Texas Boating Laws at a Glance

The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) enforces state boating laws found primarily in Texas Parks & Wildlife Code, Chapter 31. These laws govern everything from boat registration to safety equipment requirements. For accident liability, key provisions include:

• Operating a Vessel in a Negligent or Reckless Manner - Under Tex. Parks & Wild. Code § 31.099, it is an offense to operate a boat in a way that endangers the life, limb, or property of another person. This includes excessive speed, unsafe turns, or creating hazardous wakes.
• Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) - Similar to driving a car, operating a boat while intoxicated is prohibited under Tex. Penal Code § 49.06. A person is considered intoxicated if they have a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or more, or if they lack the normal use of mental or physical faculties due to alcohol or drugs. BWI is a criminal offense that can also form the basis for civil liability.
• Duty to Render Aid and Report Accidents - Under Tex. Parks & Wild. Code § 31.104, boat operators involved in an accident must stop, render aid, and exchange information. § 31.105 requires reporting any accident involving death, disappearance, or injury requiring more than first aid to TPWD within 48 hours, and property damage over $2,000 within 30 days.

Civil Liability for Boating Accidents

When a boating accident occurs, victims may bring a personal injury or wrongful death claim under Texas negligence law. To establish liability, you must generally prove:

1. Duty of Care – The boat operator owed passengers and others on the water a duty to operate safely.
2. Breach of Duty – The operator violated that duty, for example by speeding, failing to maintain a proper lookout, or boating while intoxicated.
3. Causation – The breach directly caused the accident and resulting injuries.
4. Damages – You suffered measurable harm (medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, etc.).

Who Can Be Held Liable?

Boating accident claims often involve multiple responsible parties:

1. The Boat Operator - If the operator acted negligently or recklessly, they may be directly liable.
2. The Boat Owner - Even if they weren’t driving, an owner who negligently entrusted the vessel to an incompetent or intoxicated operator can be held liable under the doctrine of negligent entrustment.
3. Marinas, Rental Companies, or Tour Operators - Businesses that rent or charter boats can be liable for negligent maintenance, failure to provide safety instructions, or renting to unqualified or intoxicated individuals.
4. Other Negligent Parties - Liability may extend to other boaters whose actions contributed to the collision or to manufacturers of defective equipment under Texas product liability law (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Chapter 82).

Boating While Intoxicated: Civil and Criminal Consequences

BWI is not only a criminal offense but strong evidence of negligence in a civil claim. A conviction can support a finding of negligence per se, meaning the violation of the statute is presumed to be negligent if it caused the injuries.

In cases involving gross negligence—conduct showing conscious indifference to the rights or safety of others—Texas law allows for exemplary damages under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 41.003.

Common Boating Accident Scenarios in Texas

• Collisions between two vessels
• Boat striking a dock, swimmer, or fixed object
• Falls overboard leading to drowning
• Water skiing or tubing accidents
• Mechanical failure due to poor maintenance
• Accidents caused by intoxicated or inexperienced operators

Steps to Take After a Boating Accident

1. Seek Medical Attention Immediately – Even minor injuries can worsen if untreated.
2. Report the Accident – Follow the reporting requirements under Texas law.
3. Gather Evidence – Take photos, collect witness statements, and preserve any available video (including GoPro or cell phone footage).
4. Avoid Giving Recorded Statements to Insurers – Consult a lawyer first.
5. Contact a Texas Boating Accident Attorney – An attorney can investigate, identify liable parties, and pursue full compensation.

Bottom Line

Texas boating accident cases blend elements of personal injury law, maritime safety regulations, and sometimes criminal law. Whether your accident happened on Lake Texoma, the Brazos River, or along the Gulf Coast, identifying the responsible parties and proving negligence is key to recovery.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a boating accident, Howard, Lotspeich, Alexander & Williams, PLLC can help you navigate the legal waters and fight for the compensation you deserve. We offer free consultations and case evaluations and we don't get paid unless you do. If you or a friend or family member has been seriously injured in a boating accident, contact us for a free consultation.

Drunk driving crashes can shatter lives in seconds—and while the intoxicated driver is the most obvious party at fault, Texas law recognizes that others may share responsibility too. In some cases, bars, restaurants, or other alcohol-serving establishments can be held liable for over-serving someone who later causes a wreck.

This is where Texas dram shop laws come in. If you or a loved one has been injured by a drunk driver, understanding how these laws work may open the door to additional compensation and accountability.

Below, we break down when and how bars can be held liable for drunk driving accidents in Texas, what the law requires to prove liability, and what victims should do after a crash.

What Is a “Dram Shop” in Texas?

The term “dram shop” comes from an old British term for establishments that sold alcohol by the dram (a small unit of liquid). In modern Texas law, a dram shop refers to any business licensed or permitted to sell or serve alcohol—such as a bar, nightclub, or restaurant.

The Texas Dram Shop Act – Key Statute

Texas dram shop liability is governed by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 2.01–2.03. The most important provision is § 2.02, which lays out the circumstances under which an alcohol provider can be held liable for the actions of a drunk patron.

📜 Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 2.02(b):

A provider of alcoholic beverages may be liable if:

1. It was apparent to the provider that the individual was obviously intoxicated to the extent that he presented a clear danger to himself and others, and
2. The intoxication was a proximate cause of the damages suffered.

In simpler terms: if a bar over-serves a customer who is clearly drunk, and that customer causes a crash, the bar could be on the hook.

What Is “Obvious Intoxication”?

This is the central question in most dram shop cases.

The statute requires that the signs of intoxication be visible and apparent to a reasonable person. That might include:

• Slurred speech
• Staggering or stumbling
• Aggression or impaired motor skills
• Inability to pay or communicate clearly
• Drinking multiple shots or rounds in a short period

If the server or bartender continues to serve alcohol despite those warning signs, the business can be found liable under the Dram Shop Act.

Can Social Hosts Be Liable Too?

No, not usually. Texas law draws a sharp distinction between licensed alcohol providers and private individuals.

Under § 2.02(c) of the Alcoholic Beverage Code, social hosts are not liable unless they provide alcohol to a minor under 18, and they are not the minor’s parent, guardian, or spouse.

What About “Safe Harbor” Protections for Bars?

Texas law also includes a “safe harbor” defense under Alcoholic Beverage Code § 106.14. An establishment may avoid liability if it can show that:

1. It required its employees to attend a Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC)-approved training program,
2. The employee actually attended that training, and
3. The employer did not encourage or pressure the employee to violate the law.

However, this defense does not apply if the bar did not follow proper policies, failed to train its staff, or actively encouraged overserving.

How Dram Shop Claims Help Drunk Driving Victims

A drunk driver may be uninsured, underinsured, or financially unable to pay for the full extent of a victim’s injuries. A dram shop claim can provide another source of financial recovery.

Victims may be able to recover compensation for:

• Medical expenses
• Lost wages or earning capacity
• Pain and suffering
• Punitive damages (in some cases)

Importantly, a dram shop case can also highlight unsafe practices and force establishments to improve their policies to protect the public.

Real-World Example

Imagine a man is served 10 drinks over the course of two hours at a local bar. He’s slurring, stumbling, and knocks over a barstool—but the bartender keeps serving him. On the way home, he crashes into a family’s vehicle, severely injuring the driver.

In this case, the bar may be found partially or fully liable for those injuries under the Texas Dram Shop Act. An experienced personal injury attorney can help gather surveillance footage, witness testimony, and receipts to prove the case.

How Long Do You Have to File a Dram Shop Claim?

Dram shop cases are subject to the Texas personal injury statute of limitations—generally two years from the date of the crash (Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 16.003).

But early investigation is critical. Evidence like video footage, employee schedules, and receipts may disappear quickly. If you believe a bar may have contributed to a drunk driving crash, speak with a qualified attorney as soon as possible.

Final Thoughts

Texas takes drunk driving seriously—and that includes holding alcohol providers accountable when they put profits over public safety. If you’ve been injured by a drunk driver, a dram shop claim may help you find justice and financial relief.

At HLAW, our attorneys understand the emotional and financial toll of a serious crash. We know how to investigate dram shop liability and build strong cases that hold negligent bars and restaurants accountable.

📞 Injured by a Drunk Driver? Call Us Today.

We offer free consultations and handle personal injury cases on a contingency fee basis. Contact us today to see how we can help.